Set 9 Focusing on Classic vs Adaptive comparison 1 / 10 Memory use in Adaptive Platform is usually: High and dynamic for complex applications Fixed and compile-time only Non-volatile only Shared only with CAN 2 / 10 Memory use in Classic Platform is usually: Very high and dynamic Optimized, low, and static for microcontrollers Cloud storage only GPU shared memory 3 / 10 AUTOSAR Adaptive applications are mostly written in: C C++ COBOL Assembly 4 / 10 AUTOSAR Classic applications are written in: Java Python C++ C 5 / 10 Adaptive communication style is: Signal-based only Only CAN Service-oriented (SOME/IP, DDS) Infotainment-specific 6 / 10 Classic communication style is: Service-oriented Signal and PDU-based Ethernet only Bluetooth only 7 / 10 Which OS standard is used in AUTOSAR Adaptive? TinyOS POSIX-based (Linux, QNX) OSEK FreeRTOS 8 / 10 Which OS standard is used in AUTOSAR Classic? OSEK/VDX POSIX QNX Linux 9 / 10 AUTOSAR Adaptive mainly focuses on: Real-time engine control only Basic lighting systems High-performance ECUs for autonomous driving and connectivity D) Tire sensors only 10 / 10 AUTOSAR Classic mainly focuses on: High computing for ADAS Small, real-time embedded ECUs (e.g., brakes, engine) Infotainment systems Cloud integration only Your score isThe average score is 98% 0% Restart quiz
